Legal Opinion

Abicht v. Searls

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1900No. 18,826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Suit by appellant to foreclose a mortgage. Answer in general denial by all the appellees, and answer of coverture and suretyship by appellee Mary E. Searls. Reply in general denial and two affirmative paragraphs of estoppel. Trial by the court. Special finding of facts and conclusions of law. Personal judgment for appellant against appellee Ezra Searls and judgment for appellees denying the foreclosure. Motion for a new trial overruled. Exceptions by appellant to each adverse ruling. The only question presented on this appeal is the correctness of the conclusions of law on the facts found.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franklin National Bank v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. First National Bank v. WillIamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Crooks v. KennettIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Wilson v. LogueIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Webb v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Town of New Castle v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Citizens Street Railroad v. ShepherdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Davis v. NeighborsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Simmons v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API