Legal Opinion

Ahmed v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 22, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00952Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 MOHAMED AHMED, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C25-952-TL 10 v. ORDER 11 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the 15 above-entitled action. (Dkt. # 1.) In the IFP application, Plaintiff states he receives $747.00 per 16 month. (Id. at 1.) He reports having no valuable property and no dependents. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff 17 left blank the portions of the application requesting information about his cash on hand, funds in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Ogunsalu v. NairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API