Legal Opinion

Leatherwood v. Hill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1906No. Civil No. 933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

AMENDED APPLICATION by E. N. Leatherwood and others, Directors of the Arizona Pioneers Historical Society, and that Society, against Wesley A. Hill, Territorial Auditor, for a Writ of Mandamus. See former opinion, ante, page 16, 85 Pac. 405. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtNave, J.

On a former hearing we sustained respondent’s demurrer to the application in this case. Ante page 16, 85 Pac. 405. Leave was then obtained and has been availed of to amend the application. The matter is now before us upon the amended application.

We shall not repeat those matters of pleading set forth in our former opinion. In addition to the facts set forth in the original application, the amended application shows that *245the petitioning society was incorporated as the Society of Arizona Pioneers in 1884, under the general incorporation laws then in force; that the purpose of the society as set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Daggett v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bennett v. NicholsArizona Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Leatherwood v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Idaho Water Resource Board v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Heiner v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Thalheimer v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API