Auto Parts Co. v. Roberts
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pam
Counsel for defendant, in his brief and argument to reverse said judgment, contends:(1) “The merchandise in question was sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the Union Automobile Company, and there being no evidence to connect the defendant with the Union Automobile Company, there can be no recovery against her.(2) “Even though Mrs. Roberts, the defendant, might have been originally responsible for the price of the goods, the bringing and prosecuting to judgment of the suit against Fred F. Roberts was a bar to a suit against her. ’ ’
Defendant, in urging the first contention, maintains that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. HutchinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
- Hess v. KillebrewIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Ferry v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- Mussenden v. RaiffeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
- Laguna Valley Co. v. FitchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. Barron G. Collier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Longo v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929