Legal Opinion

Kaaro v. Ahmeek Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1914No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Keweenaw; Cooper, J., presiding. Case by Erick Kaaro against the Ahmeek Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff on September 23, 1910, while he was in defendant’s employment and engaged in the performance of his duties.

Defendant for a number of years prior to plaintiff’s injury had been operating the Ahmeek copper mine. While plaintiff, a miner, but at the time of *664the injury acting as shift boss, was engaged in moiling a start, preparatory to drilling a hole at the bottom of shaft No. 3, a studdle fell from a staging about 45 feet above in the shaft, where timbermen were engaged in timbering the shaft.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sjogren v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Petaja v. Aurora Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Germaine v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. KnopfMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Strand v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Midland Valley Railroad v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Koskell v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Horn v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Vrelenich v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Aho v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API