Legal Opinion

State v. Goddard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 28, 1971PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Following conviction for a felony in 1967, defendant was subjected to an enhancement of penalty under the Habitual Criminal Act, ORS 168.085. He appeals, citing as error: (1) the failure of the trial court to allow defendant to collaterally attack his prior felony convictions, and (2) selective enforcement of the Habitual Criminal Act against men only, and not women, violated the defendant’s right to equal protection and due process of law. We consider them in order.

In 1963, following a felony conviction, Habitual Criminal Proceedings were regularly brought against the defendant. At that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Dixon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bailleaux v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rook v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Storms v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. HodgdonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API