Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Iowa & Minnesota R. Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 12, 1876PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Winneshiek Gircioit Gourt. The defendant is a corporation engaged in constructing a railroad. The plaintiff', while acting as employe of defendant, was injured through, the carelessness of a co-employe, and brings this action to recover. At the time of the accident the defendant was using a gravel train in its work of constructing a road-bed.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Winneshiek Gircioit Gourt. The defendant is a corporation engaged in constructing a railroad. The plaintiff', while acting as employe of defendant, was injured through, the carelessness of a co-employe, and brings this action to recover. At the time of the accident the defendant was using a gravel train in its work of constructing a road-bed. The train had stopped and the plaintiff was shoveling off gravel, when it suddenly started without any signal being given, throwing the plaintiff off, and causing the injury sued for: Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The defendant asked the court to give the following instructions:

“ 1st. The burden of proof is upon the plaintiff to establish by evidence that defendant is a corporation operating a railroad, and if you find from the evidence that defendant was engaged only in the business of filling in the road-bed, constructing side-tracks and riprap, such business would not constitute defendant a corporation engaged in operating a railroad; and in absence of proof that defendant was connected with the railroad whereon the injury complained of occurred, then you will find for the defendant.
“ 2d. The mere…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deppe v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bradford Construction Co. v. HeflinMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Akeson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Butler v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Cahill v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Roe v. WinstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API