Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Tishman Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about April 7, 1995, which, inter alia, denied defendants and third-party plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment for contractual indemnification and granted third-party defendant Heydt Contracting Corporation’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court properly determined that appellants, as general contractor for the construction project, were not entitled *299to common-law or contractual indemnification from third-party…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Clapper v. County of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dayton Beach Park No. 1 Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- New York University v. Royal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- Jackson v. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Ramatowski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Petracca & Sons, Inc. v. Capri Constr. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Volis v. 801 Seventh Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001