Legal Opinion

New York University v. Royal Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered January 26, 1993, which, inter alia, granted the cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to *528CPLR 3212 by plaintiffs New York University ("NYU”), Tishman Construction Corporation of New York ("Tishman”) and the Travelers Insurance Company ("Travelers”) (collectively "plaintiffs”), declaring that defendant Royal is obligated to indemnify plaintiff Tishman for the $50,000 and its costs and attorney’s fees incurred in an action entitled Amore v New York Univ. (Sup Ct, Kings County, index No. 14566/89…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martinez v. Tishman Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API