Legal Opinion
In re Mattox
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 26, 1996No. 22PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*426ORDER
BRUGGINK, Judge.
On May 7, 1992, petitioner Judith Ward Mattox was suspended from the practice of law before this court. The suspension was to continue until Ms. Mattox complied with the requirements for reinstatement pursuant to Appendix F, Rule VI, of the Rules for The United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) (hereafter, all subsequent references to rules within the RCFC are to Appendix F). Ms. Mattox applied for reinstatement on October 16, 1995. The matter was assigned to this judge pursuant to Rule VI(C). After considering petitioner’s written and oral presentations, as well as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In the Matter of Arthur Lawrence Abrams, an Attorney-At-LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mynette Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022