Legal Opinion
Alexis E. Ushakoff and Stanley A. Baron v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 24, 1964No. 2-58PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
This case was referred pursuant tn Rule 45 to Donald E. Lane, a trial commissioner of this court, with directions, to make findings of fact and recommenda tions for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report filed December 6, 1962. Briefs were filed by the parties, exceptions to the commissioner’s findings of fact and recommended conclusion of law were filed by the defendant, and the case was submitted to the court on oral argument of counsel. Since the court is in agreement with the findings and recommendation of the trial commissioner, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Marshall v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Rca Corporation v. Data General Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- The Robbins Company v. Lawrence Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Fmc Corporation v. The F. E. Myers & Bro. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.