Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Armstrong World Industries

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 14, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-3520PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FLANNERY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Turner & Newall PLC (“T & N”) and Nicolet, Inc. (“Nicolet”), and the motion of defendants Atlas-Turner, Inc. (“Atlas”), and Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. (“Bell”) to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. These motions allege that this court lacks personal jurisdiction over these defendants.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Fletcher McDaniel was employed from 1950 to 1982 as a plasterer’s helper. He alleges that he worked at various job sites in and around the District of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rochon v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
  2. Nielsen v. Sioux Tools, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  3. U.S. Ship Management, Inc. v. Maersk Line, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  4. Ross v. Product Development Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1989
  5. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API