Legal Opinion

University of Oregon v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 20, 1970No. C.D. 4095PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case involves an apparatus invoiced as a “Monark Bicycle Ergometer” that was imported from Sweden in 1965 and entered at Portland, Oregon. It was classified by the government as other medical apparatus under item 709.27 of the tariff schedules and assessed duty of 86 percent ad valorem.1 Plaintiffs claim that it is properly classifiable under item 678.50 as a machine not specially provided for, dutiable at 10 percent ad valorem.2

An ergometer is an instrument for measuring and recording the amount of energy used or work done. It is in some respects similar to a conventional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffschlaeger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API