Legal Opinion

Aoki v. Gilbert

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 30, 2022No. 2:11-cv-02797Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS T. AOKI, M.D., an individual, No. 2:11-cv-02797-TLN-CKD and AOKI DIABETES RESEARCH 12 INSTITUTE, a California Non-Profit Corporation, 13 ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 GREGORY FORD GILBERT, an 16 individual; et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Thomas Aoki (“Aoki”) and Aoki Diabetes 21 Research Institute’s (“ADRI”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. 22 (ECF No. 437.) Defendants Bionica, Inc. (“Bionica”) and Gregory Ford Gilbert…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API