Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Godbold v. Saulsberry

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 1, 1995No. AV93000164PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Jim Saulsberry filed a complaint for workmen's compensation benefits in the Circuit Court of Wilcox County against Roy Godbold, alleging that he was owed benefits for a work-related injury. Following oral proceedings, the trial court found Saulsberry to be permanently and totally disabled. Godbold appeals.

The record reflects that in late May or early June 1989, Saulsberry was employed by Godbold to operate a chain saw to cut pulpwood. On June 20, 1989, Saulsberry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. International Paper Co. v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Henderson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Cook Transports, Inc. v. BeaversCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alamo v. PCH HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. Page v. Cox & Cox, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  3. Associated Grocers of the South, Inc. v. GoodwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  4. Cagle v. BROCK AND BLEVINS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Pike County Commission v. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API