Legal Opinion

Hill v. Wood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

In the summer of 1925, plaintiff, John R. Hill, entered into a contract with Dudley Gately whereby Gately was, for an agreed consideration, to perform certain work, principally excavating, on a portion of what was then known as the Roosevelt Coast highway.

The contract provided, among other things, as follows:

“It is further agreed that the party of the first part (Hill) shall pay to the party of the second part (Gately) the sum of money earned under the unit prices herein agreed upon, according to the monthly estimate of the state highway engineer. The said payments shall not include that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Malila v. MeachamOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Severy v. MyrmoOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API