Legal Opinion
Pacini v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 1983No. Docket 59525PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals by right the trial court’s entry of accelerated judgment, GCR 1963, 116, based on the running of the two-year statute of limitations period as set forth in MCL 691.1411(2); MSA 3.996(111X2).
Plaintiff filed her complaint in this case on July 29, 1980, seeking damages for injuries she sus*3tained when she fell on a city sidewalk on May 8, 1978. The complaint alleged that plaintiff was injured as a result of defendant’s "negligence and unlawfulness, and the nuisance maintáined by it” when she stepped into a hole or depression in the sidewalk, causing her to fall to the ground and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Ford v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Davis v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Palomba v. City of East DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Zimmer v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Davis v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Veeneman v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Garcia v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Garcia v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.