Legal Opinion

State v. Byrd

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm capable of being concealed upon his person. Hpon trial he was found guilty and from the judgment appeals.

The defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict of not guilty as presented upon his motion.

The basis of the motion is that there is a failure of proof, in that the evidence introduced is insufficient to support a finding by the jury that defendant had been formerly convicted of a felony.

To establish the prior conviction, the state offered in evidence an exemplified copy of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. BlackOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City Motor Trucking Co. v. Franklin Fire Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lynd v. ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. KnightenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. AdkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API