Caruso v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
POPOVICH, J.:
¶ 1 David Caruso, Jr., and his legal guardians, David Caruso, Sr., and Geraldine Anne Caruso, (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the judgment entered on their behalf in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Appellants allege that the trial court erred by denying Appellants’ motion to mold the verdict and concluding that Appellee Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange1 was hable to Appellants for post-judgment interest only with respect to the amount of the judgment that remained unpaid by AppeUee. Upon review, we affirm.
¶ 2 The principal facts of this case are not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kinney-Lindstrom v. Medical Care Availability & Reduction of Error FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Raheem v. University of the ArtsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Kinley v. BierlySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Society v. Independence Blue CrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Sulkowski v. Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.