Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bradshaw v. Oklahoma State Election Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 13, 2004No. 100,836Published

1Concurrence

OPALA, V.C.J.,

with whom WATT, C.J. and EDMONDSON, J., join, concurring.

T 1 I concur in today's assumption of jurisdiction and in the issued command that the State Election Board place the petitioner's name on the general election ballot as an Independent candidate for the U.S. Congress from District No. 4.

I 2 The question presented by the petitioner's writ quest is whether she is a qualified candidate for the congressional office she seeks. The State Election Board ruled her disqualified by the provisions of 26 O.S. Supp.2004 § 5-105(A),1 finding that she fails to meet that statute's…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Oral Roberts University v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Cox v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API