McDowell v. Mattingly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION NATHAN McDOWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-383-CHB ) v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FAITH MATTINGLY, et al., ) ORDER ) Defendants. ) *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, [R. 25]. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Defendant filed a Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that Plaintiff’s failure to respond is an independent basis upon which to grant summary judgment, [R. 29]. Plaintiff has not responded to that Reply…