United States v. Arora
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
I
Introduction
In this civil suit for conversion and trespass, the United States contends that Doctor Prince Kumar Arora intentionally tampered with and destroyed cells in a research project at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Arora denies tampering and in any case responds that the Government sustained no damages by reason of the cell deaths.
The Court, sitting without a jury, received testimony and exhibits over several days and has considered the parties’ post-trial briefs. On the basis of the evidence and pleadings, the Court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Yuan v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- De Simone v. VSL Pharm., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- EDI Precast, LLC v. CarnahanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Yuan v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.