Legal Opinion

United States v. Arora

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 26, 1994No. Civ. PJM 93-1281PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

I

Introduction

In this civil suit for conversion and trespass, the United States contends that Doctor Prince Kumar Arora intentionally tampered with and destroyed cells in a research project at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. Dr. Arora denies tampering and in any case responds that the Government sustained no damages by reason of the cell deaths.

The Court, sitting without a jury, received testimony and exhibits over several days and has considered the parties’ post-trial briefs. On the basis of the evidence and pleadings, the Court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Diamond v. ChakrabartySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. Yuan v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. De Simone v. VSL Pharm., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  4. EDI Precast, LLC v. CarnahanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  5. Yuan v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API