Legal Opinion
Beta Sigma Rho, Inc. v. Moore
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.
Pursuant to CPLR 3212, defendants move for summary judgment against the plaintiffs upon the ground that there are no triable issues of fact and also that, as a matter of law, there is no merit to the cause of action alleged in the complaint.
The defendants are all past or present members of the State University of New York Board of Trustees, except Richard A. Siggelkow, who is Dean of Students at Buffalo.
The plaintiffs are six nationally affiliated fraternal organizations which seek a judgment declaring a resolution of the Board of Trustees of State University of New York invalid insofar as it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Waugh v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Webb v. State University of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1954
- Hughes v. Caddo Parish School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1945
- Hughes v. Caddo Parish School BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- University of Rochester v. WagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Eisen v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Chi Realty Corp. v. Colby CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Chi Realty Corp. v. Colby CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986