Legal Opinion

United States v. Natalie Granberry

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1990No. 89-1974PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

Natalie Granberry appeals from her conviction for using a communication facility (a telephone) in the illegal distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). Her conviction will be affirmed.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In October 1989 Natalie Granberry had a telephone conversation with an acquaintance of hers in which she arranged to sell that acquaintance, for $100, 10 tablets of N-Hydroxy-3,4-methylenedioxyampheta-mine, a chemical analogue of 3,4-methylen-edioxyamphetamine, which is a Schedule I controlled substance. 1 Granberry was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Louis I. Gordon, Eduardo Jose Garcia, Jeffrey Mark Berg, James M. Cowen, and Eric Theodore LubovCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Edward Pastor and Martin WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. William SpainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. James R. TurcotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Richard "Bird" Hodge Richard Hodge, United States of America v. Akil GreigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Karl Hofstatter (92-1836) and Michael Griffor (92-1805)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Richard Lester KleckerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API