United States v. Karl Hofstatter (92-1836) and Michael Griffor (92-1805)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(1), it is a criminal offense knowingly or intentionally to possess a “listed” chemical with intent to manufacture a controlled substance. Under 21 U.S.C. § 813, as enacted in the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986, a “controlled substance analogue” is treated as a controlled substance to the extent that it is intended for human consumption.
The defendants in the case at bar were found guilty of possessing and conspiring to possess the chemicals ephedrine and phenyl-propanolamine — “listed precursor chemicals” under 21 U.S.C. § 802(34)(C) and (I) —…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Randy GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Cheryl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James R. TurcotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.