Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 14, 2010No. 10, September Term, 2009Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by HARRELL, Judge, which BARBERA, J., Joins.

I doubt that anyone who sat on this case, whether on this Court or any court through which it passed, could identify the smell of ether before now, if at all.1,2 To his credit and *388training,3 Officer Lewis at least appreciated the odor of ether present and emanating from Bailey4 and associated it with a role in the life cycle of a specific illicit drug, PCP.5

*389The smell of ether has been described as a “unique and pungent aroma ... associated with POP,” People v. Luna, 140 Cal.App.3d 788, 790, 189 Cal.Rptr. 792 (2nd Dist., 1983), a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. Jesus Antonio RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API