Kostika v. Cuomo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWachtler, J.
The sole issue presented in this case is whether the penalty imposed by the Secretary" of State against the petitioner real estate broker was " 'so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233, quoting Matter of Stolz v Board of Regents, 4 AD2d 361, 364). The Appellate Division found that the secretary’s $200 fine was an adequate punishment but that his direction that, as a condition for the removal of the suspension of petitioner’s real estate broker’s license, the broker…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Sigety v. IngrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Stolz v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Butterly & Green, Inc. v. LomenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Diona v. LomenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Berlow v. LomenzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.