Legal Opinion

Bianco v. Pullo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1961No. Appeal, 86PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an appeal by Alice Bianco, plaintiff, from an order granting the prayer of garnishee’s petition to show cause why judgment obtained by Alice Bianco against the garnishee by default should not be opened and the garnishee let into a defense.

*625The plaintiff, Alice Bianco, obtained a judgment against the defendant, Louis F. Pullo, an undertaker, entered September 15,1954 in the amount of $1,787.63 on a judgment note given her by the defendant for a loan.

On May 21, 1954, said defendant instituted suit against Michelina Dramis, for alleged nonpayment of a funeral bill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. McKay v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Pinsky v. MasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. SEC. Bank v. Bellsouth Adv. & Pub. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Goodfriend v. Diamond Chemical Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1961
  4. Bianco v. PulloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Provident Credit Corp. v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API