In Re Powell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
It is settled law that cumulative sentences may be imposed on conviction or plea of guilty of two or more offenses charged in separate counts of the same indictment. S. v. Moschoures, 214 N.C. 321, 199 S.E. 92; S. v. Graham, 224 N.C. 341, 30 S.E. 2d 151; S. v. Chavis, 232 N.C. 83, 59 S.E. 2d 348. However, jurisdiction to inflict separate, cumulative punishments in such cases is dependent upon the fact that distinct violations of the law have been committed, and in order that separate offenses charged in one indictment may carry separate punishments, they must rest on distinct criminal acts.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HaskinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Bargesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- In re Franklin on Habeas CorpusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HollmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- State v. MeshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. HooverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. NeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.