Legal Opinion
State v. Samarel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 10, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
231 N.J. Super. 134 (1989)
555 A.2d 40
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
KENNETH M. SAMAREL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted January 25, 1989.
Decided March 10, 1989.
Before Judges KING, BRODY and SKILLMAN.
Francis X. Moore, attorney for appellant (Michael R. Speck, on the brief).
John Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Mark P. Stalford, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.
After trying the matter de novo on the record made in a municipal court, the Law Division found…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Romano v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. YoskowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- State v. MaureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- State v. HollandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- State v. GiordanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- State v. SnyderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.