Legal Opinion
Bartel v. New Haven Township
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1982No. 81-875, 81-881Published
1Opinion of the Court
323 N.W.2d 806 (1982)
Steven A. BARTEL, Appellant (81-875), Respondent (81-881),
v.
NEW HAVEN TOWNSHIP, Respondent (81-875), Appellant (81-881).
Nos. 81-875, 81-881.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 31, 1982.
Muir & Heuel, Ross Muir and George E. Meinz, Rochester, for Bartel.
Cragg & Bailly, Robert S. Cragg and Dan K. Prochnow, Minneapolis, for New Haven Tp.
Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant, Steven A. Bartel, sustained personal injuries in a one-car automobile accident when the vehicle he was driving left a New Haven Township road at a curve…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kerr v. KerrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Haugen v. Town of WalthamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Jangula v. KlocekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Bartel v. New Haven TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Rolette County v. Pierce CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.