Legal Opinion

Cates v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1989No. 031-88PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

DUNCAN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of injury to a child pursuant to V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 22.04. The trial court assessed punishment at ten years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections and a fine of $2,000.00. We granted the appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine if the court of appeals was correct in its determination that appellant’s oral confession was not a product of “custodial interrogation” and consequently the prophylactic warnings enunciated in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. McCrory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Paez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Harm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API