Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The plaintiff, Mrs. Frances Niohols, as beneficiary, instituted this suit upon a policy of insurance issued by defendant upon the life of. her husband, Bynum E. Nichols, in the sum of $5,000, and providing for double indemnity “upon receipt of due proof that the Insured died as a direct result of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent, and accidental means, independently and exclusively of all other causes, ’ ’ etc. The policy further provided “that the Double Indemnity shall not be payable if death resulted from self-destruction, whether sane or insane,” etc.

The jury found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Persons v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Milstead v. KaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wright v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. Burrier v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Barnes v. Prudential Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944
  5. Burrier v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API