Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Miller

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 24, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court adopts the factual statement set forth in the plaintiff’s opening brief which the defendant previously adopted in his answering brief.

Defendant was an owner, trainer and driver of harness horses. Plaintiff was an owner and groom. Plaintiff filed a three count complaint, Count I being a claim that plaintiff was entitled to minimum wages for work done for defendant from July 22, 1975 through October, 1976, Count II being a claim for paddock pay of $10.00 per paddock and Count III being a claim for repayment of loans. Defendant thereafter filed a counterclaim for training and caring…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. General Motors Corporation v. CoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Walsh v. Hotel Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Husband M v. Wife DSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Ademski v. RuthSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dishmon v. FucciSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Bet, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjust. of Sussex Cty.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Ball v. Division of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Baylis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API