Legal Opinion

Ademski v. Ruth

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 5, 1967PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLCOTT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the Superior Court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss appellee’s appeal to the Superior Court from a Justice of the Peace.

Appellee moved to dismiss the appeal. He argues that Rule 5, Del.C.Ann., permitting appeal by serving and filing a notice of appeal requires a waiver by appellee of the issuance of a citation and writ of error. The motion is denied. The rule is clear that the endorsement acknowledging service of the notice, present in this case, is a sufficient signification of an acceptance. No formal waiver of the issuance of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Casey v. Southern Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1942
  2. Williams v. SingletonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. S. & S. BUILDERS, INC. v. Eagle Truck Transport, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1957
  4. Wilson v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  5. Johnson v. MaykowskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1945

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Redden v. McGillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Mumford v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. Husband M v. Wife DSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API