Munchinski v. Solomon
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
David Stewart Cercone, United States District Judge
I. Introduction
Plaintiff, David Munchinski .(“Munchin-ski” or “Plaintiff’), filed a two count Amended Complaint against Defendants, Gerald Solomon (“Solomon”), Ralph War-man (“Warman”), John Kopas, III (“Ko-pas”)1, and Dana L. Fayock, Executrix of the Estate of George Fayock (“Fay-ock”)(collectively “Defendants”), asserting, claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violation of his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution at Count-1 and a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging malicious…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024