Legal Opinion

Munchinski v. Solomon

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 2017No. 2:13cv1280PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

David Stewart Cercone, United States District Judge

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, David Munchinski .(“Munchin-ski” or “Plaintiff’), filed a two count Amended Complaint against Defendants, Gerald Solomon (“Solomon”), Ralph War-man (“Warman”), John Kopas, III (“Ko-pas”)1, and Dana L. Fayock, Executrix of the Estate of George Fayock (“Fay-ock”)(collectively “Defendants”), asserting, claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violation of his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution at Count-1 and a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging malicious…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodgers v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API