E. Aigeltinger, Inc. v. Burke
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to foreclose a lien for the value of materials alleged to have been furnished by the plaintiff to C. W. Burke Co., a corporation, subcontractor under a corporation known as Lindgren Co., who was the original contractor for the erection of a building for the Olympic Club in San ^Francisco. The materials were furnished for use, and were used, in said building, and in the completion of the subcontract of said G. W. Burke' Co. Issues were formed, a trial was had, and findings and judgment were given in favor of the defendant Lindgren Co. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
Th…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Phillips v. Sanger Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grant v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Henry Cowell Lime & Co. v. Santa Cruz County National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Newton v. Johnston Organ & Piano Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Western Lithograph Co. v. Vanomar ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Davis v. Pacific Studios Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.