Sullivan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.

Sutton, J.,

dissenting from division 2 of the majority opinion of the court, and from the judgment of reversal. The part of the answer stricken on demurrer consisted of allegations to the effect that the attorneys for the plaintiff, while advertising the property for sale, told the administratrix that it was not the custom of the plaintiff to seek a deficiency judgment, that their client would bid the amount of the indebtedness secured by the loan deed and was willing to accept the property for the debt, but that it was neces sary to foreclose in order to complete the transfer of the title…