Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2017No. 14CR0832; A161058Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, and unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the police search of his camp trailer exceeded the scope of the search warrant under which the police conducted their search.1 The state concedes the error, acknowledging that the affidavit supporting the search warrant failed to “establish a nexus between the objects sought and the place to be searched.” State v. Tidyman, 54 Or App 640, 643-44, 635…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State v. ThibodeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API