In re Keele
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
I,PER CURIAM.
This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from the filing of formal charges by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Daniel R. Keele, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS
Lutke Matter
Wayne Lutke filed a disciplinary complaint against respondent with the ODC.1 Respondent failed to timely answer the complaint, and' subpoenas were issued compelling his appearance and production of documents at a scheduled deposition on October 30, 1997. Although he received notice, he failed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.