Legal Opinion

McCullum v. Barrington Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about January 30, 1992, which granted defendants’ motion and cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The plaintiff was allegedly injured because of a defect in an elevator that he was to repair. He has no cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1) because his work did not involve "contemplated hazards related to the effects of gravity inherent in the particular task being performed” (Oden v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kowalsky v. Conreco CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Tamara B. v. Pete F.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Oden v. Chemung County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Enderlin v. Hebert Industrial Insulation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Lindstedt v. 813 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Kaczmarek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  4. Sanders v. TDX Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Skinner v. G & T Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API