Legal Opinion

Poullette v. Silverstein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 21, 2002No. 1-01-0263PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Plaintiff, Sylvia Poullette, brought this action against defendant, Ira Silverstein, alleging legal malpractice in the preparation of a will and trust for her mother, Pearl Dopp. The trial court dismissed the complaint as time-barred by section 13 — 214.3(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure (the Limitations Act or Act) (735 ILCS 5/13 — 214.3(d) (West 1994)). On appeal, plaintiff contends that the circuit court misinterpreted subsection (d) of the statute and that the statute is unconstitutional as applied by the court. For the following reasons, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs complaint alleges…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Petersen v. WallachIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Village of Lake Villa v. StokovichIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wackrow v. NiemiIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Estate of Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. KattenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Robinson v. Johnson Supplemental opinion upon denial of rehearing - filed March 25, 2004 - added to end of this opinionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Anderson v. First American Group of CompaniesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API