Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Hartman

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 13, 1949No. 33 & 34PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

Actions by Judith Weinberg, an infant, by her next friend, Samuel Weinberg, and by Samuel Weinberg against John Hartman and William Hartman, trading as Hartman and Hartman Lexington Mill, to recover damages for injuries incurred by Judith Weinberg in falling into a corn crusher at Defendants'' mill. The first action seeks to recover damages for permanent injuries, pain and suffering sustained by Judith as a result of the accident. The second action, on behalf of Samuel Weinberg, the father, seeks to recover various sums of money expended by him in and about effecting a cure of his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Carlisle v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  5. L.S. Ayres Company v. HicksIndiana Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Villani v. Wilmington Housing AuthoritySuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Murphy v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Beaston v. James Julian, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1956
  5. Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API