Legal Opinion

United States v. Reginald Levi

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1993No. 93-1451PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

Reginald Levi appeals the 13-month term of imprisonment the district court 1 imposed on him following revocation of his supervised release. He contends that his sentence violates the Ex Post Facto Clause because the court relied on a policy statement in the Sentencing Guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(d), which was not in effect at the time he committed the underlying offense. He also contends that the district court erred in sentencing him pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(d) because it conflicts with the language of the enabling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We affirm.

BACKGROUND:

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. Harold DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Wiley Hill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. James William MathenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Kenneth GoingsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API