Legal Opinion
Prisk v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 13, 2022No. 0:21-cv-01723Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA James Prisk, Case No. 21-cv-1723 (WMW/LIB) Plaintiff, ORDER v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Defendant. Before the Court is Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of America’s (Travelers) motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Dkt. 31.) For the reasons addressed below, the Court denies Travelers’s motion. BACKGROUND In May 2020, a vehicle owned by the City of Hermantown (Hermantown) struck Plaintiff James Prisk. At the time of the accident, Travelers insured Hermantown. The insurance policy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Heim v. American Alliance Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Associates of the Black HillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Schoening v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Casper v. City of StacyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991