Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bona v. Village of Orange

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1999No. 98-1814PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

P & Y contends that laches and mootness require dismissal of this appeal. For the following reasons, P & Y’s contention has merit.

First, the Bonas did not act with the requisite diligence and promptness required in this election case. “ ‘Extreme diligence and promptness are required in election-related matters.’” State ex rel. Manos v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 562, 563, 701 N.E.2d 371, 372, quoting In re Contested Election of November 2, 1993 (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 411, 413, 650 N.E.2d 859, 862. If a party seeking extraordinary relief in an election-related matter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In re Protest Filed with the Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Gutierrez v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ryant Committee v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. The Ryant Commt. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Moore v. MaloneOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Moore v. MaloneOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Scott v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API