Legal Opinion
Russell v. AT & T Technologies, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided September 7, 1990No. 88-259-Civ-T-17Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the following:
Defendant AT & T’s motion for summary judgment against plaintiff, Joseph Russell, as to Count I of plaintiff’s third amended complaint. Motion for summary judgment filed February 27, 1990 Defendant AT & T’s motion for summary judgment on Crossclaim of Columbus-McKinnon Corporation, filed February 27, 1990
Memorandum in opposition to AT & T’s motion for summary judgment by Defendant, Columbus-McKinnon Corp., filed April 9, 1990
Plaintiff’s response to AT & T’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barbara R. Gross v. Southern Railway Company, Nancy Ruth Canipelli v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.