Legal Opinion

People v. Pao Fun

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided July 9, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.

Alleged to have offered to perform massages without being properly licensed, defendants each stand charged with a single count of attempted unauthorized practice of a profession. Although the People have partially corroborated the misdemeanor complaint by filing the supporting deposition of an undercover police officer — the recipient of defendant Myung Lee’s alleged tender of a massage — no records from the State Education Department have been submitted. This opinion serves to explain the basis for the court’s ruling that such records are necessary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Bliss v. BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BenjaminCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API