Legal Opinion
Harness v. PARKAR
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 2012No. 87A04-1107-PL-380PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
William J. Harness and Bridget V. Harness (“the Harnesses”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their request for injunc-tive relief and entry of final judgment in favor of Tabassum Parkar, Arshad Husain, John Mattingly Homes, Inc. (“JMH”), and Lakeridge Crossing Homeowners Association, Inc. (“the Association”). We affirm.
ISSUES
The Harnesses raise three issues, which we consolidate and restate as: whether the trial court erred by denying their request for injunctive relief and entering judgment in favor of Parkar, Husain, JMH, and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harness v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Drees Co., Inc. v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Johnson v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- City of Lawrenceburg v. Milestone Contractors, L.P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hoose v. DoodyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marvin Hamilton and Linda Hamilton v. Schaefer Lake Lot Owners Association, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Wanda Roberts v. Anthony W. HensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Castlewood Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Leticia Guerra-Danko (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- David R. Ulrich and Marcia K. Ulrich v. Brad R. Minear and Miranda G. Minear (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Jeanne Rippe v. Daniel RippeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014