Legal Opinion
Scott v. Rockaway Community Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hortense Gabel, J.
The petitioner has moved under CPLR article 78 for an order reinstating her to her former position of employment with the respondent Rockaway Community Corporation (Rock-away) and for back pay.
*179The respondent Rockaway opposes this petition on the ground that the petitioner’s employment was properly terminated. The respondents Community Development Agency (CDA) and Council Against Poverty (CAP) oppose the petition on the ground that no privity of contract exists between the petitioner and each of them and, therefore, they owe no obligation to the petitioner.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newman v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Matter of Newman v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Waxenbaum v. Seward Park Housing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fiammetta v. St. Francis HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Foster v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Murray Hill Mello Corp. v. Bonne Bouchee Restaurant, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1982
- Sprentall v. Beacon Health Options, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021